trees, aka cyclical process

here’s what laura jane read so movingly tonight to midland town council. (btw, it went fab! lj did her usual awesomeness, wore a tee shirt with a tree on the front and the fitting tth logo on the back, and then rushed off with julie to see maude barlow.) is the council receptive? i dunno. but i hope they plant more and bulldoze less. back in winter, one of the councillors made a reference to ‘tweety birds’. he might as well call african-americans ‘niggers’–perhaps he does, but not in public. when the council respects birds and trees and nematodes, i can lay my burden down and dance. maybe i should start dancing anyway.

We’re here to ask that you think of trees, and everything, in a new way.

As elected representatives, you have to both follow the people’s wishes and also lead with new ideas.

Here’s a new idea.

The idea is that linear processes, such as mining and manufacturing, lead to extinction, whereas cyclical processes, such as recycling and retail, are forever renewing.

A linear process is based on a line.

It has a beginning and an end.

It’s unnatural.

A cyclical process, on the other hand, is based on a cycle.

It doesn’t really begin or end.

It can be very natural.

Nowhere are cyclical processes better seen than in trees.

But trees are no longer completing the cycle.

Instead of growing old and returning to the forest floor, trees are ending up in landfills or polluting the air.

Initiatives like Zero Waste Simcoe, the Severn Sound Environmental Association, and Sustainable Severn Sound understand this is a problem.

For example, a few years ago, Severn Sound was in big trouble.

But we came up with the Severn Sound Sustainability Plan, which the Town ratified, and we are making some key changes through Sustainable Severn Sound.

Trees are part of the Town’s sustainability plan.

Luke Raftis, the sustainability coordinator for Sustainable Severn Sound, writes that the main drivers of trees are ‘health promotion…, aesthetic value, [and] preserving & enhancing woodlands.’

He adds, ‘these are but a few of the reasons why trees are important.’

The organization Trees Canada notes that trees ‘help reverse our greenhouse gases’.

A healthier planet means a healthier us, which means less hospital visits.

A similar organization, Trees Ontario, reports that ‘during the 1980′s up to 30 million trees a year were planted on rural privately owned properties across Ontario. In the late 1990′s planting levels dropped to as low as 2 million trees per year. Experts tell us that in order to achieve 30 per cent forest cover and a healthy ecosystem we need to plant over a billion more trees.’

So what do trees have to do with cyclical thinking?

The old way of thinking is based on our incomplete understanding of fire.

We saw fire burn trees and leave ashes.

We learned to think waste, like ash, is okay.

We learned to think linearly.

In the beginning, we clever humans learned to control fire.

It cooked our food and warmed us and kept the dark at bay.

It still does, though we use fire in the form of electricity.

But we think of fire and of electricity based on linear thinking, which leaves waste.

We discovered storehouses of ancient trees in the forms of coal and oil which are nearly perfect, portable, burnable energy, but we still leave waste.

We powered our Industrial Revolution with coal and oil and invented technological marvels like the plane and the car.

And problems like smog and emphysema … and climate change.

Now we’ve reached the end of our linear rope.

Linear thinking is one-way thinking, like driving down a dead-end street, like how we think of fire which burns and dies out, taking away heat and light, and leaving behind ash.

David Suzuki says we need a new way of thinking to solve old problems.

The cyclical way of thinking takes a tree too but seeks to use all of it, leaving no waste, no lost opportunity, no problems.

Treasure Day, the Blue Box, the Green Bin, and the FIT and Micro-FIT programs are fresh ideas and evidence of cyclical thinking at the town, county, and province levels.

Cyclical thinking is two-way thinking, mutual thinking, like the Golden Rule, which we all grew up with.

See?

We know this.

Nothing new.

Think of the voyage of The Titanic–linear thinking is a one-way trip to the bottom.

It’s unbalanced; it’s unnatural.

It’s a fix; it fails to restore.

Cyclical thinking, on the other hand, restores the balance.

Trees are a part of the balance that restores us.

We are starting to rethink our ways and rebuild society.

We need to cut down trees, yes–for furniture, for paper, for houses.

But we also really, really need living trees for cleaning, for breathing, for food.

We need trees for playing, for the mind.

Unfortunately, trees don’t grow overnight.

They take decades.

In human hands they take planning.

They take vision, like the vision a century ago that beheld Little Lake Park.

And more than reducing, reusing, and recycling, our challenges today take rethinking.

So, what can we do?

Well, obviously we are stewards of existing trees.

For the future we need to plant more trees, and not just at Little Lake Park.

We need to plant shade trees down King, and Hugel, and Midland Av, and Yonge, that cool us in the summer and break the wind in winter, that beautify our town, that attract birds and bees and tourists and ratepayers.

We need to plant edible trees in gardens and share the bounty with those less fortunate.

But more importantly, we need to plant ideas.

When the Girl Guides plant trees in Little Lake Park, they are really planting ideas, ideas that will sustain them for the rest of their lives.

We need to get across the idea that there is no such thing as a line that generates cost-free, limitless waste, that in a circle, your waste is someone else’s food or money.

Fresh ideas have made an impact before.

For example, the writings in the original Greek of Aristotle were lost to the West for many centuries, but preserved in the East.

When they were rediscovered, an intellectual flowering took place.

What, then, do we stand to gain from other thinkers, or from other cultures, or from nature itself?

When you have the chance to plant a tree, or if you have to bulldoze one or cut it down, may you remember linear thinking.

May the circle be unbroken.

Thank you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

the techno dream

from www.historyoftheuniverse.com: ‘People appeared very recently and rapidly dominated and transformed the entire planet, also learning how to leave it. There are vast resources in our Solar System and huge amounts of energy. Once mankind learns to capture these resources we will become wealthy beyond our wildest dreams. People have also created computers, and software is now being developed which can learn and evolve. If computers ever learn how to develop other computers, they might become completely independent of their human inventors. Independent computers might rapidly colonize this corner of the Galaxy.’

‘once’ really is ‘if’, and it’s a mighty iffy if. as is noted, techno-progress requires ‘huge amounts of energy’. we haven’t found it yet. more importantly, yet not mentioned, is we have yet to solve our problems. right now, more energy means more problems. it’s a star wars scenario–remember when they were in the trash compacter? until then, maybe it’s good a thing ‘space is big. You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it’s a long way down the road to the chemist’s, but that’s just peanuts to space.’ (douglas adams)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

a leap of faith

to believe or not to believe, that is the question.

i think, when push comes to shove, i’m a believer, a believer in something or someone who dreamed this human adventure.

but i also agree with the atheists in that we’re essentially on our own. i mean, physically, space is vast and mostly empty. we can’t even get to the next planet, let alone the next star or galaxy. spiritually, do we have free choice, or what?

but, unlike some atheists, i think the future is very inaccurately predictable (i mean, we can’t even predict the weather with any degree of accuracy past four days).

so i have faith that we’re gonna make mistakes–a lot of them–but that making mistakes is part of something larger, something universal.

the problem is, locally, there’s no shoving. it seems like the same-old same-old. we keep doing the same old thing. meanwhile, like jim honeycutt, we slip past the point of no return.

(who was jim honeycutt? he passed the grand island bridge–the point of no return–entered the upper rapids and went over niagara falls. climate change is like that–some events may be irrevocable.)

or do i change how i look at things, and in so doing, change the things i look at?

what do i put my faith in, and in so doing, has faith in me?

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

‘Nobody crosses over’

‘I remember being in Chili, going along a road from the airport. My driver told me, “Oh, here on the right are all the rich houses, and here on the left are the slums. And nobody crosses over this road.” We live in an incredibly wounded world. I don’t want to give the impression that there are goodies and baddies and that we can issue a moral judgment. We all know that within the slum area there are incredibly beautiful men and women–and incredibly beautiful mothers and fathers who are struggling against a drug culture. Likewise, on the other side of the road in the rich areas, there are incredibly beautiful people. It’s not as simple as good people versus bad people. That road was like a wall. Within each of us there is also a wall.’–Jean Vanier, “Living Gently in a Violent World,” pp. 60-61

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

thomas berry’s hope for an ecological future

‘a new intimacy is sought with the integral functioning of the natural world; destructive anthropocentrism is replaced with eco-centrism; transition to the primacy of the integral Earth community’

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

trees and lawns

as we sat outside eating dinner sue looked at the large oak and maple in her yard and said that she partly chose this place cuz of the trees, and as we took the dog out for his evening sniff we came to a corner lot of nothing but grass in full sun. ‘one day,’ she declared, ‘this will be covered in veggies.’

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Flagellum Unspun–The Collapse of “Irreducible Complexity”

ken miller writes, ‘ the struggles of the intelligent design movement are best understood as clamorous and disappointing double failures – rejected by science because they do not fit the facts, and having failed religion because they think too little of God.’

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment